Love is a verb, and I want to show you every day with my actions how much you mean to me.When I take a moment to think about my life with you, I just feel so grateful. There are so many people in the world who don't have what we do.You're like a book I can't put down or a song I want to listen to on repeat forever. Being in love with you is one of the best feelings in the world.Watching you solve a problem or think about an idea is endlessly fascinating to me. I will never stop loving the way your mind works.Your perspective and your heart help me understand. I feel like I couldn't fully see the world until I found you.Then I feel the light of your love on me and know I'm here with you. Sometimes I feel like a distant star alone in the dark universe. In this world where everything is always changing and it all sometimes feels so dark, your love is the light that guides me.These are a few ways to express your feelings: If you're having trouble trying to come up with things to say about love to the person that means everything to you, we can help. Love is a profound emotion, and the right words to express it can also be very deep. When we’re together, all my problems disappear. I love you because we are family and friends at the same time. You make me feel like I’m the only person in the world. Ewegen, S. M. (2013). Plato's Cratylus: The Comedy of Language. United States: Indiana University Press.Meaningful and Deep Things to Say to Someone You Love 120 Reasons Why I Love You: I love the way you look at me.You can find the exact translation above in "Plato's Cratylus" (Ewegen 2013) with some analysis and the original Greek for certain phrases. The Cratylus in particular is a dialogue which explicitly dramatizes this conflict between what human beings wish words would say. He makes intentional use of "living speech" to isolate ideas clearly in dialogue or at least to help delineate where that's no longer possible. How does Socrates himself typify his own philosophical practice? At least in this instance, as a methodological skepticism which relies on the intelligibility of language itself to resolve problems. So where do you wish for us to start examining ? For what we have done is embark upon a certain general project that we will be able to see whether the words themselves will bear witness to us that they are applied to particular things in a way that does not come altogether from chance, but has a certain correctness about it (397a Sachs - see note) See the Cratylus 397a for more on this construction of Socrates' philosophical activity - ie, that he is simply after what words themselves must say if they are to hang together intelligibly: Nevertheless Socrates has a number of positive ethical and methodological doctrines, about the nature of the gods and the good and being itself but the idea is that these are derived from honest questioning with an interlocutor, and finding what “language itself” has to say if it is to make any sense these doctrines emerge dialectically, as it were organically, rather than being disclosed as though they were always known by him to be true. precisely by knowing the limits of his wisdom, and not claiming to be able to teach what cannot be taught. He is therefore the wisest of his countrymen. More generally this is the sense in which Socrates claims the oracle named him as the “wisest”: by knowing his own ignorance, and not pretending to know what he cannot, he is capable of learning - of becoming wise. Socrates never took payment for his teaching. Socrates admits his ignorance, implicitly attacking pretenders to knowledge - namely the sophists, who were paid teachers of rhetoric, and from whom the earliest philosophers struggled to distinguish themselves.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |